t
R
P Y.
sir,
Chambers,
Supreme Court, Hongkong,
10th. March, 1909.
C.O.
13042
363
IREC Rege 17 APR 09
I have the honour to acknowledge Your
Excellency's letter of 3rd. instant, enclosing copies of a
Despatch from His Excellency the British Minister at Pekin, with
correspondence attached between the Foreign and Colonial
Offices relative to the action taken by the Acting Consul-
-General at Canton in connexion with Letters of Request issued
to him from this Court. I am sorry to say that we are all at
cross-purposes, as it is perhaps not to be wondered at when
laymen are discussing a very highly technical rule of procedure
of the Courts. It may possibly have occurred to Your Excellency
on perusing the correspondence that Sir John Jordan's despatch
of 12th. February does not correspond with Mr. Antrobus' letter
of 6th. January to the Foreign Office, the words "by His
Majesty's Courts in China" after "service of Hongkong writs"
being omitted. As Mr. Fox's contention went
-
at least
originally far beyond this, it is necessary to put matters
straight.
In doing so it is essential that I should
safeguard myself on one point. In consenting to discuss the
matter,
}
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.